Djokovic prepares for final round of Australian visa war

MELBOURNE: Novak Djokovic was set to fight a battle to stay in Australia without a vaccine in federal court on Saturday, when the government again revoked his visa on COVID-19 entry rules and the clock of the first tennis major of the year ticked down.

The government has vowed not to deport the world’s top ranked player until the case is completed, although he was ordered to return to pre-disposal detention at 8am (Friday 2100 GMT) on Saturday before his trial.

His legal team submitted his appeal shortly after Immigration Minister Alex Hoque exercised discretionary power to revoke his visa, hoping Serbia would still begin defending its Australian Open title on Monday.

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government has garnered domestic support for its tough stance on border security during the epidemic but has not escaped criticism for handling Djokovic’s visa application, and the saga has sparked a global debate on vaccination rights and responsibilities.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vuકેiકે on Friday criticized the Australian government, calling it “harassment and bullying (onu) … the best tennis player ever.”

“(You) will never come close to not only (her), but to any ordinary person in our and your proud nations,” Vusic said on Instagram.

A Serbian health ministry official defended Djokovic against suspicions that the player used the positive COVID-19 test as a basis for his release document, the QR code of which showed first negative and then positive results, according to German news magazine Der Spiegel.

Zoran Gojkovic said the ministry’s analysis showed the document was “completely valid”.

The governing body of world tennis, the International Tennis Federation, called the situation “disappointing for all involved”, saying the countries’ Kovid-19 protocol needed to be communicated explicitly, but Djokovic’s remarks were also reserved.

“While the ITF believes that full vaccination is an individual decision, we believe that we should all take these responsible steps to ease sanctions and prevent such incidents in the future,” he said in a statement.

Djokovic, 34 and Vikram, bidding to win the 21st Grand Slam title, was told on arrival on January 5 that the medical exemption that enabled him to travel was invalid. A court overturned that decision on procedural grounds.

But Hawke on Friday used his privilege to revoke Djokovic’s visa “on the grounds of health and well-being.”

Hawke said he had considered information from Djokovic and the authorities and that the government was “firmly committed to protecting Australia’s borders, especially in relation to the COVID-19 epidemic”.

Judge Anthony Kelly, who first revoked the revocation, said the government had agreed not to deport Djokovic – who opposed compulsory vaccination but generally did not campaign against vaccination – before the case was over, and the player met his lawyers. Can.

‘Protecting Borders’

The controversy has become a political touch for Morrison as he prepares for the May election.

“Australians have made many sacrifices during this epidemic, and they rightly expect that the outcome of those sacrifices will be safe,” he said in a statement. “This is what the minister is doing today to take action.”

Australians have suffered some of the longest lockdowns in the world, and the country has seen an eruption of Omicron, which has brought nearly a million cases in the last two weeks.

More than 90% of Australian adults have been vaccinated, and an online poll by News Corp Media Group found that 83% favored Djokovic’s deportation.

His cause was not helped by the announcement of a false entry, where a box was marked stating that he had not traveled abroad in the two weeks before leaving for Australia.

In fact, he traveled between Spain and Serbia.

Djokovic accused his agent of wrongdoing and also admitted that he should not have been interviewed and photographed for a French newspaper on December 18 when Kovid-19 was infected.

But the player has been hailed as a hero by anti-vaccination campaigners.

‘Patently irrational’

Djokovic’s legal team said the government was arguing that allowing him to stay in Australia would provoke others to refuse vaccinations.

One of his lawyers told the court that this was “clearly irrational” because Hawk was ignoring the “anti-wax sentiment and the impact it could have on the public order” by forcibly removing “this high profile, legally relevant, insignificant risk … player”.

Djokovic, who looked relaxed while practicing in Melbourne Park on Friday, was included in the draw for the Open as the top seed and is set to face his teammate Serb Miomir Kekmanovic on Monday.

Speaking before Hawk’s decision, Greek world number four Stefanos Sitsipas said Djokovic was “playing by his own rules” and that the players receiving the vaccine “looked stupid”.

In Belgrade, some had already resigned Djokovic to be absent from the tournament.

“She is a role model for all of us, but the rules must be clearly set,” Milan Majstrovic told Reuters TV. “I’m not sure how big the involvement of politics is.”

Another passerby, Anna Bojik, said: “He could either be vaccinated to be number one in the world – or he could be stubborn and end his career.”

Read all Fresh news, Breaking news And Corona virus news Here

Source link

Leave a Comment